Executive and Research Authority
dranthonyqbowen.com
Founder-controlled environment used to develop and refine the methodology.
New: Take the KSM™ AI Visibility Assessment and identify what is limiting your visibility in AI-generated answers. Start now
Applied Research · Multi-Vertical Study
A longitudinal applied research program evaluating whether the Knowledge Structuring Model produces measurable improvements in AI visibility across different industries, business models and entity types.
Participating organizations are assessed at baseline and at 30-, 60- and 90-day intervals using the same three-pillar methodology: Structured Extractability, Entity Salience and Citation Authority.
Research question
“Can KSM™ operate as a repeatable, industry-agnostic framework for measuring and improving AI visibility across diverse SMB verticals?”
The study evaluates whether a standardized KSM™ implementation produces measurable directional improvement across organizations with different knowledge structures, audiences, geographic markets, regulatory conditions and conversion models.
Methodology
01
Freeze the Day 0 overall KSM™ AI Visibility Score, individual pillar scores, evidence and controlled prompt set.
02
Apply prioritized improvements to the organization’s weakest AI visibility signals while preserving a dated implementation log.
03
Repeat the assessment at Days 30, 60 and 90 using the same core methodology.
04
Evaluate overall score movement, pillar-level changes, entity recognition, factual accuracy, citations and cross-vertical patterns.
Metrics
Primary outcome
Change in the total KSM™ AI Visibility Score from baseline to Day 90.
Secondary measures
Implementation cohort
PeptideDoc is the first paid client deployment, not the full scope of the study. Each implementation is reported only to the checkpoint that has been measured and documented.
dranthonyqbowen.com
Founder-controlled environment used to develop and refine the methodology.
sonianoel.com
The assessment moved from 33/100 to 68/100 at the second measured checkpoint. The implementation is entering Day 60; the Day 60 result is pending.
Read the Sonia Noel case studypeptidedoc.com
The implementation moved from a 35/100 pre-launch assessment to a 62/100 Day 1 baseline. Days 30, 60 and 90 remain pending.
Read the PeptideDoc case studyWhy it matters
Can the same core methodology be implemented consistently?
Can KSM™ operate across substantially different industries and entity types?
Can the assessment convert identified gaps into prioritized, measurable action for SMBs?
Study coverage
MarTech Edge · October 6, 2026
MarTech Edge covered the PeptideDoc implementation as a real-world test of whether structured digital improvements lead to measurable changes in external AI recognition and citation.
Industry coverage derived from the study announcement with additional editorial context
Read the coverageResearch integrity
KSMModel.ai separates observed results from planned checkpoints and unmeasured outcomes. Individual implementations may support case-study evidence, but conclusions about cross-vertical repeatability will be reserved until comparable measurement cycles are completed.
Next step
Establish a baseline across Structured Extractability, Entity Salience and Citation Authority and identify the signal most likely to constrain your AI visibility.